Medicine · Français

Will the FDA approve relutrigine in SCN2A/SCN8A developmental and epileptic encephalopathies before 15 January 2027?

deadline 2027-01-15 confidence medium tier 3 evidence
62%PolySignal estimate

Resolution criterion

Yes if the FDA approves the NDA by 15 January 2027 (Drugs@FDA or a Praxis release). A complete response letter, a postponement of the PDUFA date, or the absence of a decision by that date count as no. An approval restricted to only SCN2A or only SCN8A (not both) counts as no for this question; flag for manual review if the label's exact scope is unclear.

Verified starting state

PDUFA date pushed to 27 December 2026 after the FDA classified additional sensitivity analyses as a "major amendment". No new clinical study was requested, and no safety or manufacturing issue was reported. The request for sensitivity analyses suggests a debate over the robustness of the primary endpoint. (29 June 2026)

What pushes it up

What pushes it down

What would move this number most

The primary uncertainty is whether the additional sensitivity analyses will sufficiently resolve the FDA's concerns regarding the primary endpoint's robustness for both genetic indications simultaneously.

How this number is built

Deadline2027-01-15
Base rate73%
Best evidencetier 3 · 1 article(s) used
Independent runs58 · 65 (spread 7 pts)
Confidencemedium
Evidence capnot triggered
Last revised2026-09-25 09:04
Modelgemini-3-flash-preview

Sources consulted

Jefferies (note d'analyste) : répartition des causes de CRL — fabrication >50%, qualité produit 41%, données cliniques 27%. Statistique rapportée par un tiers, pas un fait officiel de niveau 1.tier 3 · Jefferies via presse spécialisée · 2026-09-22

Probability history

2026-09-25 09:04 62% 49 article(s) on file · gemini-3-flash-preview
  • What pushes it up. The current PDUFA date of 27 December 2026 falls before the 15 January 2027 deadline [Starting State, tier 1].
  • What pushes it up. The FDA has explicitly stated that no new clinical studies are requested and no safety or manufacturing issues have been reported [Starting State, tier 1].
  • What pushes it up. Manufacturing and quality issues, which account for over 90% of Complete Response Letters according to some analyst data, are reportedly not an issue here [19, tier 3; Starting State, tier 1].
  • What pushes it down. The FDA's request for additional sensitivity analyses suggests significant debate over the robustness of the primary endpoint [Starting State, tier 1].
  • What pushes it down. The resolution criterion requires approval for both SCN2A and SCN8A; a partial approval for only one would result in a 'No' [Resolution Criterion].
  • What pushes it down. The classification of the sensitivity analyses as a 'major amendment' indicates that the initial data submission was insufficient for a standard review cycle [Starting State, tier 1].
  • What would move this number most. The primary uncertainty is whether the additional sensitivity analyses will sufficiently resolve the FDA's concerns regarding the primary endpoint's robustness for both genetic indications simultaneously.
2026-09-21 22:21 67% 44 article(s) on file · gemini-3.7-flash

Reasons not recorded for this revision (detailed history has only been kept since recently).

2026-09-19 07:39 68% 36 article(s) on file · gemini-3.6-flash

Reasons not recorded for this revision (detailed history has only been kept since recently).